Beyond Technical Transparency: Explainability as a Safeguard Against Manipulative AI*
| Art der Publikation: | Artikel in einem Konferenzbericht |
| Zitat: | |
| Publication status: | Accepted |
| Buchtitel: | IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (IEEE MetroXRAINE) |
| Jahr: | 2025 |
| Monat: | Oktober |
| Ort: | Ancona (Italy) |
| Organisation: | IEEE |
| Abriss: | Large Language Models (LLMs) now write with a fluency and persuasiveness that can subtly steer users' choices. When their outputs lack clear and comprehensible explanations, this persuasive power risks undermining human decision-making capacity, raising serious ethical concerns. Current explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques focus primarily on technical transparency for epistemic purposes (how a model works); they are rarely intended to reveal to the user the kind of influence they are subject to. Drawing on the Indifference View of manipulation, we advance a preliminary framework that reconceives explainability as both an epistemic and an ethical imperative. The core idea is based on explanatory metadata: layered annotations that accompany model outputs with four complementary types of explanation-informative, justificatory, causal, and precautionary-which give models the ability to detail the reasons underlying the influence they exert. Doing so shifts the XAI goal from mere transparency to responsible influence. It positions explanations as a safeguard against the manipulative behaviour of generative AI systems, laying the groundwork for future methods that measure, audit, and actively constrain ethically problematic influence. |
| Schlagworte: | AI ethics, Explainable AI, manipulation |
| Autoren | |
| Hinzugefügt von: | [] |
| Gesamtbewertung: | 0 |
|
Anhänge
|
|
|
|
|
Notizen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Themen
|
|
|
|
|
