Dear guest, welcome to this publication database. As an anonymous user, you will probably not have edit rights. Also, the collapse status of the topic tree will not be persistent. If you like to have these and other options enabled, you might ask Admin (Ivan Eggel) for a login account.
 [BibTeX] [RIS]
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using MRI analysis and machine learning algorithms
Type of publication: Article
Citation: givian_early_2024
Type: article
Journal: Discover Applied Sciences
Volume: 7
Number: 1
Year: 2024
Month: December
Pages: 27
ISSN: 3004-9261
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452...
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-024-06440-w
Abstract: Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial to prevent their progression. In this study, we proposed the analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on features including; hippocampus (HC) area size, HC grayscale statistics and texture features (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, contrast, correlation, energy, homogeneity, entropy), lateral ventricle (LV) area size, gray matter area size, white matter area size, cerebrospinal fluid area size, patient age, weight, and cognitive score. Five machine learning classifiers; K-nearest neighborhood (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and multi-layer perception (MLP) were used to distinguish between groups: cognitively normal (CN) vs AD, early MCI (EMCI) vs late MCI (LMCI), CN vs EMCI, CN vs LMCI, AD vs EMCI, and AD vs LMCI. Additionally, the correlation and dependence were calculated to examine the strength and direction of association between each extracted feature and each classification of the group. The average classification accuracies in 20 trials were 95% (SVM), 71.50% (RF), 82.58% (RF), 84.91% (SVM), 85.83% (RF), and 85.08% (RF), respectively, with the best accuracies being 100% (SVM, RF, and MLP), 83.33% (RF), 91.66% (RF), 95% (SVM, and MLP), 96.66% (RF), and 93.33% (DT). Cognitive scores, HC and LV area sizes, and HC texture features demonstrated significant potential for diagnosing AD and its subtypes for all groups. RF and SVM showed better performance in distinguishing between groups. These findings highlight the importance of using 2D-MRI to identify key features containing critical information for early diagnosis of AD.
Userfields: file={Full Text PDF:https\://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs42452-024-06440-w.pdf:application/pdf}, language={en}, urldate={2024-12-19},
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), Machine learning (ML), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), medical imaging, Mild Cognitive impairment (MCI)
Authors Givian, Helia
Calbimonte, Jean-Paul
{and for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}
Added by: []
Total mark: 0
Attachments
    Notes
      Topics